Services
API Security Testing
APIs expose your data and business logic directly. We test whether yours enforce authorization on every request, return only what they should, and stand up to abuse.
Why APIs need their own testing
Modern products are built on APIs: the mobile app, the single-page front end, partner integrations, and customer automation all talk to the same endpoints. Because an API accepts requests from anyone who can reach it, every endpoint has to check — on every call — who is asking and whether they are allowed to see or change the object they've requested.
When that check is missing or inconsistent, the impact is usually severe: one customer reading or modifying another's data simply by changing an identifier. These flaws are easy to introduce, hard to see in a user interface, and invisible to most scanners. API security testing focuses on finding them.
What we test
Coverage is agreed per engagement and guided by your API documentation, specifications, or observed traffic. Typical areas include:
Authentication
How clients obtain and present credentials or tokens, token validation and expiry, and weaknesses in key or token handling.
Object-level authorization
Whether changing an identifier in a request lets a caller read or modify objects that belong to someone else — the most common serious API flaw.
Function-level authorization
Whether ordinary users can call administrative or privileged endpoints, or use HTTP methods they shouldn't have access to.
Excessive data exposure
Responses that return more fields than the client needs — internal identifiers, other users' details, or sensitive attributes hidden only by the front end.
Input validation and mass assignment
Injection, unexpected types and values, and requests that set fields the caller should not control, such as roles or account status.
Rate limiting and abuse
Where agreed, whether endpoints can be abused for enumeration, brute force, resource exhaustion, or automated misuse of business functions.
Business logic
Sequencing, state, and workflow flaws — for example, completing steps out of order or replaying requests to gain an advantage.
Configuration and error handling
Verbose errors, debug endpoints, permissive CORS, outdated versions left reachable, and undocumented endpoints.
Not every area applies to every engagement. The areas tested are listed in the scope we agree with you before work starts.
How we test APIs
We start from whatever describes your API — an OpenAPI or similar specification, a Postman collection, documentation, or traffic captured from your application — and build a map of endpoints, objects, and roles. Testing then concentrates on the relationships between them: which identities can reach which objects through which operations.
Each finding is backed by the exact requests and responses needed to reproduce it, so your developers can verify the issue and the fix without guesswork.
Multiple identities
Authorization testing needs at least two accounts per relevant role (and per tenant, for multi-tenant products) so cross-account access can be checked.
Real examples, no customer data
Findings are demonstrated with test accounts and test data. We avoid accessing real customer records beyond what is needed to confirm an issue, and agree how to handle any we encounter.
What you receive
A written report designed for the developers who will fix the issues:
- A summary of the API's overall security posture and the most significant risks.
- Endpoint-level findings with risk ratings, affected operations, and request/response evidence.
- Reproduction steps your team can run themselves to confirm each issue and its fix.
- Remediation guidance, including where a fix belongs (for example, a shared authorization layer rather than individual endpoints).
- Retesting of fixed issues where it is part of the agreed engagement.
Before testing starts
- API documentation or a specification, and the base URLs for the in-scope environment.
- Test credentials for each relevant role, ideally two accounts per role and tenant, shared through an agreed secure channel.
- Agreement on rate-limit and abuse testing, so it doesn't affect real users.
- Written authorization to test the API and the infrastructure it runs on.
Please don't send credentials, keys, or vulnerability details through the website form. We agree a secure channel once an engagement is confirmed.
Engagement process
From first conversation to verified fixes
A simple, predictable process. Actual timing and deliverables depend on the scope we agree.
Swipe to see all 6 steps
FAQ
API Security Testing: common questions
Can't find your answer? Ask us directly, or browse every question in the full FAQ.
Our core testing approach applies to REST and similar HTTP APIs. If your API uses GraphQL, gRPC, or another style, tell us during the initial discussion and we'll confirm whether it fits the engagement before scoping.
Yes, if we can observe the API in use — for example through your web or mobile application — we can map endpoints from that traffic. Documentation makes testing more complete and efficient, so we recommend sharing whatever exists.
If the API is only used by your own web front end, a web application test will exercise much of it. If it is used directly by mobile apps, partners, or customers, dedicated API testing gives better coverage of endpoints the web interface never calls.
Need your API tested?
Tell us about your application, API, or software security requirements. We can discuss the appropriate scope and next steps.
What happens next
- 01We review your enquiry and reply by email
- 02An initial discussion about your application and goals
- 03A written scope — nothing is tested until it's agreed